Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, , 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 11 '21 at 20:25
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6154
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
Memory 38.7
1-Core 70
2-Core 189
50% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 404
50% 379 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M10-1Q
Nvidia(10DE 11CF) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.33
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 19.3
15% 18.3 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 15.7
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 168 159 167 169 168 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.1% Average
Read 242
Write 107
Mixed 207
SusWrite 151
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 11.3
41% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 321
236% 311 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 6.6
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback