Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive387% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D54
MotherboardMSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 19:37
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 180
2-Core 356
113% 211 Pts
4-Core 709
8-Core 1362
123% 1,036 Pts
64-Core 2,470
153% 2,470 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 114%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 201
Reflection 267
Parallax 212
164% 227 fps
MRender 244
Gravity 168
Splatting 138
144% 183 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 146%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3332 2323 865 858 866 916 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
387% Outstanding
Read 2,962
Write 3,371
Mixed 3,037
SusWrite 1,527
614% 2724 MB/s
4K Read 83.6
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 117
385% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1359
DQ Write 1,138
DQ Mixed 1,234
928% 1,243 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 387%
Great: 429%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
65GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 459 444 449 447 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 458
Mixed 446
SusWrite 452
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 62.8
206% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 220
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 122%
Great: 137%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
118GB free
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 54 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 499
Write 410
Mixed 382
SusWrite 91.8
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 43.4
145% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 195
150% 204 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 91%
Force MP510 256GB
142GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 922 255 264 256 258 266 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,419
Write 1,202
Mixed 1,211
SusWrite 370
235% 1,050 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 85.7
318% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 1,196
DQ Mixed 856
683% 938 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 221%
Great: 221%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 65.3
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 43.1
151% 52.9 GB/s
SC Read 34
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 43.6
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 53.7
74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 142%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54) Builds (Compare 425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX (MS-7D54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback