Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 525 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 11:26
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6132
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 49.4
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 191
60% 113 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 359
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 54GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 15 20 24 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.82% Terrible
Read 6
Write 1.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 19.2
6% 8.18 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.7
435% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.82%
Great: 87%
Vmware Virtual disk 5GB
5GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 29 29 29 28 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 43.8
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 29.6
25% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4
662% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback