Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V15.5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V15.5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V15.5
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 16:51
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 251
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 699
72% 579 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1085) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 54.6
Parallax 7.5
5% 22.8 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10.5
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 740
Write 656
Mixed 612
149% 670 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.5
212% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 785
DQ Mixed 582
478% 678 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 199%
Samsung MZNLH256HAJD-00000 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: RVT2200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 459 338 195 196 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 468
Mixed 340
SusWrite 306
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 48.4
159% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 347
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22.8
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 27
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V15.5 Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V15.5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback