Today's hottest deals

Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 05:08
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 399
53% 396 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115
EVGA(3842 6367) 3GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2114 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 68.9
61% 72.4 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 70.6
59% 72.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 224 51 103 54 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64% Good
Read 309
Write 207
Mixed 238
SusWrite 102
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 26
120% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 158
136% 196 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1TB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 106 107 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 111
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 106
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 4
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.2
9% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 1.1
1% 0.88 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
51% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMD8GX3M2A1600C9 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0215 CMD8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $107Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback