Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2048 x 1536 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 10:14
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.9% Good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 188
56% 104 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 427
57% 427 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 16.3
10% 14.4 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 13.7
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTE110S 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 100 190 187 234 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 1,083
Write 107
Mixed 135
SusWrite 167
80% 373 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 16.9
100% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 184
153% 227 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TS512MSH64V6H 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 28.6
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback