Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 95.6 2-Core 183 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 332 45% 336 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	2.91% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 6 Parallax 1.3 3% 3.73 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 0.1 2% 3.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.91% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 70 21 8.3 50 52 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.4% Poor	Read 212 Write 165 Mixed 142 SusWrite 58.2 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 10.6 48% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 25.2 DQ Mixed 15 13% 20 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 53%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125 23,438 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 532GB free Firmware: JA2OA590 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 69 69 68 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 91.1 Write 84.6 Mixed 38 SusWrite 68 51% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	94x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	28x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	23x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	12x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87