Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '22 at 03:40
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 126 60% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 329 34% 273 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E305) 2GB CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 46.9 Parallax 55.2 36% 48.7 fps	MRender 46.2 Gravity 42.9 Splatting 32.3 32% 40.5 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100 4,989 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 187 182 184 187 189 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 331 Write 254 Mixed 128 SusWrite 189 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 16.2 74% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 60 DQ Mixed 53.1 47% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 100%
Wl2000gs A6472E 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 57 135 145 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 167 Write 112 Mixed 108 SusWrite 128 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 84%
USB Flash Disk 1GB 448 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	5.39% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 4.5 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 5.6 9% 8.17 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 30% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.39% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 3,104 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 18.1 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 13.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16