Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion FR486AA-UUW m9455sc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion FR486AA-UUW m9455sc  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 19:43
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 52.9
29% 43.4 Pts
4-Core 65.3
8-Core 75.5
9% 70.4 Pts
64-Core 74.3
5% 74.3 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
XFX(1682 2490) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
Lighting 12
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 6.2
10% 8.97 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 10
Splatting 3.6
6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 179 185 174 182 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.8% Above average
Read 199
Write 186
Mixed 180
SusWrite 178
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 28.4
88% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 154
117% 159 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 129%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
911GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 88 82 76 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 85.7
Write 79.4
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 84.2
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 0.6
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FR486AA-UUW m9455sc Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion FR486AA-UUW m9455sc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback