bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1 GB free of 3.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 20:03
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 44.7
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 69.5
39% 62.2 Pts
4-Core 58
8-Core 68.7
8% 63.3 Pts
64-Core 71.5
4% 71.5 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 139 143 133 128 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.3% Poor
Read 198
Write 150
Mixed 140
SusWrite 142
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 9.6
24% 8.13 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 14.3
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 8GB
6GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 203
Write 215
Mixed 208
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 9.9
32% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 15.9
12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 3GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 2560 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 5.4
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback