Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090914
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 07 '22 at 14:55
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 81
41% 63.1 Pts
4-Core 73.9
8-Core 77.4
10% 75.7 Pts
64-Core 80.4
5% 80.4 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCS5C1032CLA382 320GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JCFOR39G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 27 39 17 13 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.52% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 12.3
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 21
11% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.4 5.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 7.2
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 5.5
14% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.7
180% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.1
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 0.4
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $134
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback