Medion E15410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedion E15410  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MF50CM
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 09 '22 at 00:07
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 639
66% 532 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E39 A04B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 7.7
6% 6.27 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NSN025SA356-Y01Q2R0 256GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 316 383 365 386 383 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 443
Write 338
Mixed 346
SusWrite 359
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 18.8
90% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 35.6
85% 173 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E85-2666E 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 10.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 11.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E15410 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E15410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback