Medion E15410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMedion E15410  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MF50CM
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 16:02
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 239
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 557
63% 494 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E39 A04B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 8.1
6% 6.43 fps
Splatting 12.6
13% 12.6 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NSN025SA356-Y01Q2R0 256GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 98 96 79 73 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 451
Write 375
Mixed 357
SusWrite 83.5
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 19.8
93% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 36.2
DQ Mixed 1.1
28% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E85-2666E 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 11.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E15410 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E15410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback