Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8259U 4,608 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 68.9 1-Core 109 2-Core 221 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 602 62% 500 Pts	64-Core 611 38% 611 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 8,316 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(0100 2782) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.58% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 6.1 4% 5.27 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 5.7 5% 5.83 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.58% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast BD256GB SLCB-2280 256GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN06201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 216 167 170 169 171 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 356 Write 350 Mixed 326 SusWrite 210 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 17 72% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 291 208% 262 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4A8G165WB-BCRC 2x4GB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 46.9 MC Mixed 17.5 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 15.8 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	487x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	459x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,367x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	489x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16