To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	120.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190324
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '22 at 15:28
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 772 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 45.3 1-Core 71.9 2-Core 144 48% 87 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 564 50% 425 Pts	64-Core 2179 135% 2179 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.09 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Lighting 67.6 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 64.3 55% 67.2 fps	MRender 67.8 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 64 55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 306 305 305 304 299 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	148% Outstanding	Read 1,856 Write 1,144 Mixed 1,046 SusWrite 336 243% 1,096 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 42.5 125% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 456 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 242 195% 284 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 280%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 127 131 128 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 127 Write 129 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 128 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.2 268% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1 2x16GB 174 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	MC Read 45.1 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 30 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.6 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	264x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16