Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory120.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190324
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 15:28
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 45.3
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 144
48% 87 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 564
50% 425 Pts
64-Core 2,179
135% 2,179 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.09
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 64.3
55% 67.2 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 64
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 306 305 305 304 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,856
Write 1,144
Mixed 1,046
SusWrite 336
243% 1,096 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 42.5
125% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 456
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 242
195% 284 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 148%
Great: 280%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 127 131 128 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 127
Write 129
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 128
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
268% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 30
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.6
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback