Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N455 2,770 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 6.3 2-Core 10.5 24% 27.4 Pts	4-Core 10.1 8-Core 10.2 1% 10.1 Pts	64-Core 9.8 1% 9.8 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS543225A7A384 250GB 2,305 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: ESBOA90B SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 20 20 24 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 39.1 Write 23.1 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 24.3 20% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 41%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 120G 120GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 109GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.6% Very poor	Read 21.6 Write 17.6 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 19.2 27% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 2.7 197% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 4D34373142353737334448302D43483920 1x2GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	4.13% Terrible	MC Read 0.2 MC Write 0.3 MC Mixed 0.6 1% 0.37 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 0.6 4% 1.33 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.13% Great: 10%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM