Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 17:51
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 178
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 423
44% 352 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 5.4
4% 5.13 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.2% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 51.5
Parallax 40.9
37% 46 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 38.8
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IM2P33F8BR1-128GB 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1107B0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1216
Write 325
Mixed 58
114% 533 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 20.5
97% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 404
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 325
269% 385 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 153%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
128GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 81 77 73 73 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
47% Average
Read 88.2
Write 74.9
Mixed 42
SusWrite 75.1
51% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AM1P26KC8T1-BAAS Kingston KF2666C15S4/8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 12,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback