Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3405 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pro 3405 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111104
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 15:36
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Memory 35.4
1-Core 28.3
2-Core 53.9
24% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 46
8-Core 39.7
6% 42.8 Pts
64-Core 50.8
3% 50.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510
HP(103C 0967) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.4
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4.3
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 95 57 53 62 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 226
Write 204
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 77.2
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 6
38% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 83.5
74% 112 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
466GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 119 123 121 126 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 135
Write 126
Mixed 68
SusWrite 121
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3405 Series Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3405 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback