Today's hottest deals

HP 100-330nf

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 100-330nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AFE
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140604
Uptime31.5 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 13:44
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2500 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Memory 30.6
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 38.3
19% 29.8 Pts
4-Core 36.8
8-Core 42.5
5% 39.7 Pts
64-Core 40.4
2% 40.4 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
HP(103C 2AFE) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 1.9
1% 2 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.5
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 150 180 193 196 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.7% Average
Read 262
Write 277
Mixed 242
SusWrite 192
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 16.1
56% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 74
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 66
50% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 251
16% 251 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 100-330nf Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 100-330nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Terrible Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback