Performance Results


Gaming 122% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2255 289 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 72.2 1-Core 131 2-Core 249 82% 151 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 881 83% 686 Pts	64-Core 1,493 92% 1,493 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	145% Outstanding	Lighting 186 Reflection 204 Parallax 231 151% 207 fps	MRender 252 Gravity 204 Splatting 171 167% 209 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LH512HALU-000H1 512GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 334GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 277 244 252 258 173 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 310 Write 297 Mixed 258 SusWrite 248 63% 278 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 65.3 4K Mixed 38.7 127% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 249 198% 277 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000H1 2TB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 2TB free Firmware: HPS0NEXG SusWrite @10s intervals: 1717 1952 1958 1849 1498 856 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	303% Outstanding	Read 2,055 Write 1,800 Mixed 1,535 SusWrite 1,638 395% 1,757 MB/s	4K Read 51.9 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 72 248% 89.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,144 DQ Write 844 DQ Mixed 988 740% 992 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 303% Great: 361%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2TB free Firmware: 023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 396 392 362 386 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 355 Write 298 Mixed 313 SusWrite 351 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 87.7 4K Mixed 39.9 142% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 295 239% 338 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CVF M393A4K40BB2-CTD M393A4K40BB2-CTD M393A4K40CB2-CVF 127GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 2933, 2666, 2666, 2933 MHz 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	104% Outstanding	MC Read 35.7 MC Write 56.3 MC Mixed 34.3 120% 42.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 10.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 96.4 42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	368x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	346x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	328x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	272x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	218x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	88x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16