Performance Results


Gaming 129% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 137% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2255 289 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 73.3 1-Core 134 2-Core 264 85% 157 Pts	4-Core 522 8-Core 937 88% 730 Pts	64-Core 1,628 101% 1,628 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 185 Reflection 212 Parallax 267 151% 222 fps	MRender 269 Gravity 221 Splatting 176 177% 222 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LH512HALU-000H1 512GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 402 403 384 346 391 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 348 Write 336 Mixed 294 SusWrite 391 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 43.2 148% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 353 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000H1 2TB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 2TB free Firmware: HPS0NEXG SusWrite @10s intervals: 2242 2123 2082 1845 1300 1514 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	310% Outstanding	Read 1,996 Write 1,775 Mixed 1,511 SusWrite 1,851 401% 1,783 MB/s	4K Read 47.5 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 66.4 233% 86 MB/s	DQ Read 1,159 DQ Write 874 DQ Mixed 1,036 770% 1,023 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 310% Great: 361%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2TB free Firmware: 023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 380 393 358 340 388 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 434 Write 390 Mixed 325 SusWrite 373 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 35.3 119% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 293 238% 337 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CVF M393A4K40BB2-CTD M393A4K40BB2-CTD M393A4K40CB2-CVF 127GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 2933, 2666, 2666, 2933 MHz 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	110% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 59.3 MC Mixed 36.2 127% 44.5 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 94.1 42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	370x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	348x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	329x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	273x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	219x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	88x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16