Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 43.7 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 64.8 30% 48.7 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 131 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 80CB) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 4.6 3% 3.37 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.7 3% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N610 SSD 1TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 895GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427D SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 275 332 359 351 359 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	78% Very good	Read 399 Write 364 Mixed 363 SusWrite 338 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 33.9 108% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 158 122% 166 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1866, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18% Very poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,497x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,739x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,182x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	400x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	378x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	343x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16