Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 06:43
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 102
44% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 164
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 430
Dell(1028 1711) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 10.3
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 5.1
5% 6.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD easys tore 240GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EF43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 113 132 135 137 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 420
Write 339
Mixed 278
SusWrite 140
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 8.6
61% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 35.8
46% 82.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
S M U M 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.2% Poor
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback