Today's hottest deals

HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8223
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben, , 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 16:38
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 41.6
1-Core 51.3
2-Core 75.2
34% 56 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 135
19% 139 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 8223) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 9.1
5% 7.63 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 7.4
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
602GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HEF01C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 85 78 81 62 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 96
Write 96.4
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 76.2
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 1.7
470% 5.37 MB/s
DQ Read 1.8
DQ Write 22
DQ Mixed 7.3
81% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 14.2
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.7
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 8,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback