Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 15:01
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 385
53% 391 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.8
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
658GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 76 84 78 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 90.5
Write 93.9
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 81.1
55% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 57%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
0GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.7 3.8 4.5 3.5 3.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 2.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 3.7
9% 8.85 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.8
196% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F6451U67F1600G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback