Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 17:25
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 504
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 0.3
32% 27.8 fps
MRender 41.9
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 29.4
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 14 35 44 45 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 431
Write 47.7
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 34
32% 151 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 6.8
75% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 99.8
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 90.7
62% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MK3256GSY 320GB-$90
28GB free
Firmware: LH013C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 33 39 40 43 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 22.7
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 36.6
17% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback