Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 00MU647

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardLenovo 00MU647  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 10:47
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 54
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 200
63% 118 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 777
66% 570 Pts
64-Core 2,091
129% 2,091 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5210 119GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,081
Write 2,855
Mixed 2,822
652% 2,919 MB/s
4K Read 98.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 102
336% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 469
DQ Mixed 462
353% 478 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback