Today's hottest deals

Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221202
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 23 '24 at 09:06
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 653
56% 481 Pts
64-Core 1,709
106% 1,709 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$290
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 205
Parallax 144
116% 164 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 136
Splatting 110
120% 153 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 114%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P400L 500GB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1905 1894 1240 618 620 622 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,215
Write 2,016
Mixed 1,262
SusWrite 1,150
320% 1,411 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 50.4
156% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 415
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 366
266% 349 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 183%
Great: 356%
SSD 2TB 2TB
55GB free
Firmware: W0221B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 417 422 424 430 238 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 459
Write 382
Mixed 396
SusWrite 392
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 18.6
86% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 35.4
75% 148 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 107%
Team T25 3512GB
3GB free
Firmware: 8101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 357
Write 340
Mixed 309
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 16.9
66% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 41.4
49% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.4% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 24.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1231 571 165 27" 1280 720 HKC272A GM27X5QIPS
Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback