Pcware IPMH510G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPcware IPMH510G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH510G
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 18:08
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$64
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 676
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 675
42% 675 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 BD20) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 21.6
13% 21.8 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 19.9
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SWR256G-101IL 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 35 36 36 32 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 423
Write 431
Mixed 370
SusWrite 81.2
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 37.1
135% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 184
166% 247 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
98GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 94 88 91 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 142
Write 127
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 90.7
71% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160T 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH510G Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Pcware IPMH510G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback