Today's hottest deals

MSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A57
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180630
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 05:12
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 662
64% 528 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 63
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 83.8
51% 72.3 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 58
Splatting 43.8
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$103
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1503 476 477 621 499 464 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,940
Write 2,175
Mixed 1,771
SusWrite 673
368% 1,640 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 70.9
246% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,259
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 1,052
792% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 243%
Great: 347%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
81GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 235 204 183 179 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 465
Mixed 448
SusWrite 236
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 58.7
204% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
WD WD140EDGZ-11B1PA0 14TB
13TB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 201 201 203 199 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 178
Mixed 129
SusWrite 201
131% 178 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.9
415% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
264GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 89 88 91 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 86.8
Write 87.9
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 88.5
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 84%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
271GB free
Firmware: 77.04D77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 82 83 84 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 88.4
Write 78.2
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 81.6
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 57%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
448GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 95 96 93 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 114
Write 130
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 95.2
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
300% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
71.6% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57) Builds (Compare 1,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M7 (MS-7A57) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $760
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback