Oneplus 6T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemOneplus 6T  (all builds)
MotherboardOneplus 6T
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1080 x 2340 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 08:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon 845
BGA-1156, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 40.6
1-Core 23.8
2-Core 45.1
24% 36.5 Pts
4-Core 74.4
8-Core 89.5
11% 81.9 Pts
64-Core 88.8
6% 88.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KLUDG4U1EA-B0C1 125GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 205 212 198 193 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
Read 361
Write 203
Mixed 217
SusWrite 192
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 16.5
56% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 102
79% 109 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BANK 0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 21.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback