Xiaomi Pad 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemXiaomi Pad 5  (all builds)
MotherboardXiaomi Pad 5
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 15:11
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon 860
BGA, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 36.2
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 80
30% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 154
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KLUEG8UHDC-B0E1 254GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 277 376 387 360 362 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.9% Good
Read 509
Write 417
Mixed 373
SusWrite 342
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 20.8
70% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 127
96% 130 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BANK 0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.6% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.2
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback