Xiaomi Pad 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemXiaomi Pad 5  (all builds)
MotherboardXiaomi Pad 5
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 16:48
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon 860
BGA, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 43.2
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 71.3
30% 49.2 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 139
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KLUEG8UHDC-B0E1 254GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 450 442 448 453 405 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.1% Excellent
Read 570
Write 455
Mixed 433
SusWrite 437
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 22.4
74% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 171
128% 170 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BANK 0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.8% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback