Xiaomi Pad 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXiaomi Pad 5  (all builds)
MotherboardXiaomi Pad 5
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 19:54
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon 860
BGA, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Memory 22.3
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 76.9
26% 46.8 Pts
4-Core 91.6
8-Core 146
15% 119 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KLUDG4UHDC-B0E1 126GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 650
Write 167
Mixed 292
80% 370 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 20.9
73% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 143
106% 141 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BANK 0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 5.3
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 304
13% 304 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback