Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 17:32
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 218
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 427
57% 426 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.95
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.55% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 10.8
7% 12 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.5
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.55%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 208 228 241 243 244 MB/s
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.4% Good
Read 252
Write 239
Mixed 227
SusWrite 231
54% 237 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 29.6
100% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 152
122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
76GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 110 115 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 45.1
SusWrite 116
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
390GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 103 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 97
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 103
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-444.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 19.6
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback