Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DP35DP
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090715
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 02:08
Run Duration602 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 75.9
42% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 138
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
PNY(196E 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 18.1
14% 17.4 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 16.5
14% 17 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 33 61 79 55 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 114
Write 103
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 60
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
96GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 76 76 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 79.9
Write 79.1
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 76
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST500LM034-2GH17A 500GB
15GB free
Firmware: 0301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 33.3
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 14.1
20% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.4
147% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 89%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 27.3
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 12.8
31% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
981GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 28.3
Mixed 25
SusWrite 12.8
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback