Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i5SYB
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170524
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 08:58
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6260U
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 116
44% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 188
22% 171 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Intel(8086 2063) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 9.8
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 306 294 303 313 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 430
Mixed 364
SusWrite 311
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 37.5
131% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 320
236% 309 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
732GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 258 295 291 289 295 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 222
Write 228
Mixed 234
SusWrite 282
55% 241 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 20.6
56% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 172
125% 161 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905663-008.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 11.1
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback