Today's hottest deals

Asus H61M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-E  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 01:04
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 115
55% 87 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 156
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 771MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3412
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.4
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 2
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 33 40 33 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.9% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 20.2
Mixed 11.3
SusWrite 27.9
12% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 50%
WD Elements 25A2 750GB
553GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 22.5
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 24.5
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 7.9
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-E Builds (Compare 1,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-E - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback