Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110-D3A-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110-D3A
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110-D3A-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 23:54
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 230
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 446
60% 449 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2673) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.7% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 41.8
24% 35.6 fps
MRender 46.1
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 35.4
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
781GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 324 388 374 373 375 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 408
Write 415
Mixed 293
SusWrite 374
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 39.5
141% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 211
197% 306 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 117%
SSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: SDFM00.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 329 437 456 443 426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 414
Mixed 408
SusWrite 424
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 54.7
193% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 297
240% 340 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 118%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
692GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 73 68 60 65 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64% Good
Read 155
Write 158
Mixed 93.9
SusWrite 67.6
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64%
Great: 109%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
631GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 92 99 96 95 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 70.6
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 96.4
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4W.16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.8% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110-D3A-CF Builds (Compare 1,417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110-D3A-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback