Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3V Plus-SI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3V Plus-SI  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 09:24
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 178
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 328
46% 340 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427GN1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 403 413 409 401 399 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 406
Mixed 377
SusWrite 403
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 47.9
159% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 241
192% 266 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB
68GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 32.8
Write 27.3
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 19.6
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 6.5
484% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 233%
WD My Passport 1TB
566GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 27.5
Mixed 24
SusWrite 19.2
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 0420 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3V Plus-SI Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3V Plus-SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback