Vultr VHP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemVultr VHP  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 07:08
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC-Rome
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 402
50% 384 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 96%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 193GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 318 347 331 319 310 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 575
Write 444
Mixed 429
SusWrite 322
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 23.3
85% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 240
176% 232 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
329% Outstanding
MC Read 158
MC Write 95.5
MC Mixed 161
395% 138 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 31.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 329%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback