Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 10:36
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 641
65% 527 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 4.7
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1203AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 50 52 53 52 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 448
Write 415
Mixed 401
SusWrite 86.6
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 40.8
137% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 240
201% 288 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$24
33GB free
Firmware: SD28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 76 76 75 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 53.7
Write 62.9
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 76.2
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 58%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
389GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 93 96 91 93 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 80.1
Write 86.2
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 92
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 63%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
47GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 90 89 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 89.3
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST500LM000-SSHD-8GB 500GB
369GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 31.5
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 14.2
21% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.3
273% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 63%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 59 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 146
Write 68.1
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 45.8
100% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.8
157% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 45%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
25GB free, PID 121f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 11.5
Write 20.2
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 12.7
21% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.3
217% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 17%
Mass Storage Device 16GB
10GB free, PID 125c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 9.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 8.8
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 8.9
11% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
97% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 34.3
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 28.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback