Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140221
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 12:44
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 177
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 342
44% 336 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3412
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 6
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00S 1TB
691GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 412 448 392 465 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 476
Mixed 373
SusWrite 425
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 52.1
189% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 255
217% 319 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback