Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 16:26
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4360-$87
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 194
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 281
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.81% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 10.6
5% 9.87 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 13.6
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 6.81%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
85GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 407
Write 486
Mixed 294
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 45.9
183% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 148
131% 203 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.8
Write 86.8
Mixed 39
53% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
455GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,291
Write 51.7
Mixed 72.8
1,054% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 872
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2
36,557% 292 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
250GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,444
Write 53
Mixed 100
1,099% 1,533 MB/s
4K Read 882
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 3.2
37,118% 295 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
661GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 172
Write 112
Mixed 95.3
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 12
14% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Fantom HDD 4TB
3TB free, PID 3101
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 36
Write 36
Mixed 30.3
44% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M379B5273CH0-CH9 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. M379B5273CH0-CH9 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-D3H Builds (Compare 2,166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback