Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191225
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 15:00
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 199
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 436
58% 436 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 20
12% 16.3 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 12.6
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cs900 SSD 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200I211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 85 14 91 65 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 348
Write 99.4
Mixed 104
SusWrite 75.6
34% 157 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 24
84% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 63.5
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 133
88% 102 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
210GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 71.9
Write 70.6
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 76.3
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 47%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
151GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 74.1
Write 36.4
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 88.6
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W6451U66J9266ND 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 30.9
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 28.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback