Today's hottest deals

Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 22:53
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 66.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 284
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 915
91% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,153
71% 1,153 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84F1) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 17
Parallax 16.5
15% 17.1 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 15.2
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P300 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0214B0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 957 886 425 400 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,494
Write 1,293
Mixed 961
SusWrite 560
240% 1,077 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 29.4
215% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 352
355% 553 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 185%
Great: 185%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
792GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 173 173 173 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 164
Mixed 109
SusWrite 173
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905713-030.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback