Today's hottest deals

Colorful H410M-T PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemColorful H410M-T PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful H410M-T PRO
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 06:56
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 220
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 551
58% 462 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 31.9
27% 34.4 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 25.7
26% 32 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFME0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 509 380 252 111 107 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 644
Write 667
Mixed 634
SusWrite 245
123% 547 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 10.6
34% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 47.6
DQ Write 38.3
DQ Mixed 38.1
30% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 226%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.18428S.007 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-T PRO Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Colorful H410M-T PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $381
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback