Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 21:03
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 63.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 201
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 581
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Asus(1043 886D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 103
Parallax 125
99% 117 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 114
Splatting 93.9
90% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 45 74 17 92 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 265
Write 10.2
Mixed 190
SusWrite 69.1
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 24
95% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 69.2
DQ Mixed 72
58% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
74GB free
Firmware: 1003YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 76 81 78 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 85
Write 76.2
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 77.8
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 27.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback