Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 23:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 187
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 494
49% 401 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.3% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 121
52% 86.2 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 33.3
55% 72.8 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pichau Gaming PG256X 256GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 427
Mixed 404
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 15.6
64% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 47.9
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 19.1
16% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 105%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
314GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 87 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 86.5
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 28.8
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 24.7
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 59 60 0" 1280 720 ALC0001
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback