Today's hottest deals

HP Z210 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Z210 CMT Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1587h
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '22 at 00:32
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$158
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 138
58% 96 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 287
38% 288 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)
52.5% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 63
53% 64.8 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 66
Splatting 60.9
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BR 480GB 480GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0328A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 168 146 4.8 101 15 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.8% Very poor
Read 251
Write 261
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 75.7
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
1% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 85%
Samsung SSD 860 QVO 2TB
1TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 32.9
Write 27.5
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 27.4
40% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 6.1
437% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5403-159.A01LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.1
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z210 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP Z210 CMT Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback